THIS IS A VERY REVEALING WAY TO LOOK AT THE CANDIDATES
I have been a Marco Rubio supporter for some time, and this polls reflects that I am not alone. Choosing who to run in 2016 and then getting behind that candidate against Hillary Clinton (or whoever) is likely the most important political decision of this generation. Choose the wrong candidate and the election goes to Hillary by default. Choose the right one, and it will still be a huge battle against the dirty politics of the Clinton organization, the Democratic demagogues, and the divisive, but powerful incumbent president who cannot run again.
Look at the negatives of many aspiring candidates. Anyone over 33% should be out--even his/her own party knows it. Rule out those candidates. Rule out Ben Carson simply on a total lack of relevant knowledge and experience as a political and governmental leader. Ditto Carly Fiorina. Absent on this list is John Kasich, who is better than most of these presidential contenders/pretenders, in both experience and leadership…and mostly proven accomplishments. That leaves Bobby Jindal, whose popularity even in his own state, is lukewarm.
FOR 6+ YEARS (some would argue longer) AMERICA HAS SUFFERED FROM INEPT, IRRESPONSIBLE AND DOWNRIGHT AWFUL LEADERSHIP AT THE VERY HIGHEST LEVELS (And I'm not talking about Congress, although Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi would also fit this description!) Simply the litany of Barack Obama's scandals, misdeeds--both before and after his election--and the continued presence of Valerie Jarrett at his elbow when Chief of Staff occupants turnover constantly. (The best one, Bill Daley, left in frustration after one year.)
THE WORST PRESIDENT IN AMERICAN HISTORY
I've already used all the adjectives I can think of to describe how bad Barack Obama is. Narcissistic, egocentric, insular, naive, inexperienced, a congenital liar, and a rascist--far worse than he claims others are. Just look at the racial/ethnic makeup of his appointees, and compare them to the demographic makeup of America. Talk about reverse rascism!
Obama supporters seem to believe and will claim that he has done many good things. Perhaps he has initiated some worthy things, but usually the wrong way, and his motives have always been questionable at best and sinister at worst. Some of the most egregious and flagrant scandals have arisen from his abuse of the power of the presidency, and the lack of transparency and truth in his administration.
The Supreme Court will be busy for years hearing cases of when Barack Obama has flagrantly abused the US Constitution. It is almost as if his studies as Constitutional lawyer were done to inform him on how many ways he can circumvent the intentions of the Founding Fathers, and impose his distorted will on the America people--with no one able to stop him.
THE PHONY CHRISTIAN = A MUSLIM IN THE WHITE HOUSE
He is not a Christian. He is a Muslim at heart. He does not love America--as Rudy Guiliani rightfully said--he hates the America of his past (the one we love) and is determined to remake America in his own distorted, Socialistic/Communist welfare-nanny state, and unexceptional model. He has personally enslaved millions of Americans in chains of economic slavery to the extent they no longer have any meaningful work ethic or self-worth. All they can do is demonstrate and point fingers, blaming others for their miserable lives.
OBAMA'S ECONOMIC SLAVERY AND ITS CONSEQUENCES
It would serve Obama's economic slaves right if the Police that they so hate, would let them run wild in their enclaves, killing each other and destroying what little viable society exists there. What they fear most is getting leadership in the government that would require them to work for their welfare checks, identify themselves in order to vote, prove their disabilities to go on the government dole, and in general, act like responsible members of society. Obama says they need not do that. He will take care of them. He will use the power of his office and his henchmen like Eric Holder to bring the power of the US government down on anyone who objects to their illicit, illegal, immoral and generally irresponsible behavior.
==================
LET'S SKIP THE VIOLATION OF RULES IN HIDING HER EMAIL
That's only a little worse than Obama concealing everything about his background…including who got him into and paid for all his university time, and his international travel during that time, and who ghost wrote his memoirs, etc. and also having his wife's' rascist thesis removed from any available source.
NOW THE QUESTION OF WHAT EXACTLY HAS HILLARY EVER ACCOMPLISHED?
Thomas Sowell | Mar 24, 2015
It is amazing how a simple question cancause a complex lie to collapse like a house of cards. The simple question was asked by Bill O'Reilly of the Fox News Channel, and it was addressed to two Democrats. He asked what has Hillary Clinton ever accomplished.
The two Democrats immediately sidestepped the question and started reciting their talking points in favor of Hillary. But O'Reilly kept coming back to the fact that nothing they were talking about was an accomplishment.
For someone who has spent her entire adult life in politics, including being a Senator and then a Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton has nothing to show for all those years -- no significant legislation of hers that she got passed in the Senate, and only an unbroken series of international setbacks for the United States during her time as Secretary of State.
Before Barack Obama entered the White House and appointed Mrs. Clinton Secretary of State, Al Qaeda operatives in Iraq had notified their higher ups, stationed in Pakistan, that their cause was lost in Iraq and that there was no point sending more men there.
Hosni Mubarak was in charge in Egypt. He posed no threat to American or Western interests in the Middle East or to Christians within Egypt or to Israel. But the Obama administration threw its weight behind the Muslim Brotherhood, which took over and began terrorizing Christians in Egypt and promoting hostility to Israel.
In Libya next door, the Qaddafi regime had already given up its weapons of mass destruction, after they saw what happened to Saddam Hussein in Iraq. But President Obama's foreign policy, carried out by Secretary of State Clinton, got Qaddafi removed, after which Libya became a terrorist haven where an American ambassador was killed, for the first time in decades.
The rationale for getting rid of Middle East leaders who posed no threat to American interests was that they were undemocratic and their people were restless. But there are no democracies in the Middle East, except for Israel. Moreover, the people were restless in Iran and Syria, and the Obama-Clinton foreign policy did nothing to support those who were trying to overthrow these regimes.
It would be only fair to balance this picture with foreign policy triumphs of the Obama-Clinton team. But there are none. Not in the Middle East, not in Europe, where the Russians have invaded the Crimea, and not in Asia, where both China and North Korea are building up threatening military forces, while the Obama administration has been cutting back on American military forces.
Hillary Clinton became an iconic figure by feeding the media and the left the kind of rhetoric they love. Barack Obama did the same and became president. Neither had any concrete accomplishments besides rhetoric beforehand, and both have had the opposite of accomplishments after taking office.
They have something else in common. They attract the votes of those people who vote for demographic symbolism -- "the first black president" to be followed by "the first woman president" -- and neither to be criticized, lest you be denounced for racism or sexism.
It is staggering that there are sane adults who can vote for someone to be President of the United States as if they are in school, just voting for "most popular boy" or "most popular girl" -- or, worse yet, voting for someone who will give them free stuff.
Whoever holds that office makes decisions involving the life and death of Americans and -- especially if Iran gets a nuclear arsenal -- the life and death of this nation. It took just two nuclear bombs -- neither of them as powerful as those available today -- to get a very tough nation like Japan to surrender.
Anyone familiar with World War II battles in the Pacific knows that it was not unusual for 90 percent of the Japanese troops defending Iwo Jima or other islands to fight to the death, even after it was clear that American troops had them beaten.
When people like that surrender after two nuclear bombs, do not imagine that today's soft Americans -- led by the likes of Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton -- will fight on after New York and Chicago have been reduced to radioactive ashes.
Meanwhile, ISIS and other terrorists are giving us a free demonstration of what surrender would mean. But perhaps we can kick the can down the road, and leave that as a legacy to our children and grandchildren, along with the national debt.
THERE IS NO DOUBT THAT HILLARY ACHIEVED A LOT OF QUESTIONABLE THINGS BEFORE--AND AFTER--BILL MOVED HER INTO THE WHITE HOUSE.
You can look up all of her questionable behaviors easily. There were many of them, involving travel-gate, shady investments, losing her license to practice law and not the least of which was the unsolved death of aide Vince Foster. The woman is really bad. Lied about her past during the Obama-Clinton campaign: "I misspoke." And the irresponsible mainstream media totally ignores all of it and defends her in the most indefensible actions. Watch this. Hear how fast the stories die out…except on Fox and at the WSJ.
READ THIS AGAIN, SINCE THE UPCOMING BUDGET DEBATE WILL MAKE IT MORE TIMELY THAN EVER, THEN WATCH THE VIDEO
White House: Deficit Will Increase 20% This Year (Despite Record Tax Revenue)
February 3, 2015 - 12:00 PM
(CNSNews.com) - The data that the White House published with President Obama’s fiscal 2016 budget proposal yesterday indicate that the federal deficit will increase by 20 percent during this fiscal year (2015) even though the administration predicts the Treasury will bring in record revenue during the year. According to Table S-1 in the “Summary Tables” appendix to the Obama budget, the deficit was $485 billion in fiscal 2014 and will be $583 billion in fiscal 2015—an increase of $98 billion, or 20.2 percent. In fiscal year 2015, according to the Obama budget tables, the federal government will take in $3.176 trillion in tax revenue and spend $3.759 trillion.
The $3.176 trillion in tax revenues the White House estimates the federal government will bring in this year is a record in both current and inflation-adjusted dollars.
In his speech announcing the release of his budget proposal yesterday, President Obama said: “Now, since I took office, we have cut our deficits by about two-thirds.” “Since 2010,” says the Obama budget proposal, “federal deficits have shrunk at an historic pace—the most rapid sustained deficit reduction since the period just after World War II. The turn away from austerity in 2014 was accompanied by another steep drop in the deficit, bringing it to 2.8 percent of GDP—the lowest level since 2007, about one-third the size of the deficit the president inherited, and below the 40-year average.”
“When ARRA was being considered, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and the staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation estimated that it would increase budget deficits by $787 billion between fiscal years 2009 and 2019,” the CBO said in a report published last year. “CBO now estimates that the total impact over the 2009–2019 period will amount to about $830 billion. By CBO’s estimate, close to half of that impact occurred in fiscal year 2010, and more than 95 percent of ARRA’s budgetary impact was realized by the end of December 2013.”
In fiscal 2008, the last full fiscal year when George W. Bush was president, the federal deficit was $458.6 billion, according to the historical tables published by the White House OMB. In fiscal 2009, presided over by both Bush and Obama, the deficit was $1.4127 trillion. In 2010, it was $1.2944. In 2011, it was $1.2996 trillion. In 2012, it was $1.0870 trillion. In 2013, it was $679.5 billion. In 2014, it was $484.6 billion. And, in 2015, the OMB is estimating it will be $582.5 billion.
THE PROGRAMS PROPOSED IN THE 2015 STATE OF THE UNION ARE grossly AFFORDABLE.
Don't take my word for it. Sit down and watch this Tony Robbins video… It will take 20+ minutes and it will blow your mind.
The fiscal 2008 deficit of $458.6 billion was 3.1 percent of GDP, according to the OMB. The OMB estimates that the $582.5 billion deficit it is projecting for this year will be 3.2 percent of GDP.
AND, IF INTEREST RATES RISE TO TRADITIONAL LEVELS, THE COST OF INTEREST ON THE NATIONAL DEBT WILL INCREASE THE DEFICIT BY $500 BILLION MORE.
FACE IT: OUR COUNTRY IS RUN BY A MUSLIM SYMPATHIZER WHO BOWS TO THE WRONG PEOPLE, BLOCKS THE RIGHT LAWS AND CONTINUES TO VIOLATE THE CONSTITUTION IN HIS ABUSE OF POWER AND LIES CONSTANTLY TO DECEIVE THE SAME MISINFORMED PEOPLE WHO PUT HIM IN OFFICE--THE VERY PEOPLE WHO HAVE BEEN MOST DAMAGED BY THE OBAMA PRESIDENCY.
- THEY HAVE TIME TO COLLECT WELFARE IN MORE FORMS AND $$ THAN EVER BEFORE.
- THEY HAVE TIME TO DEMONSTRATE ABOUT HOW ABUSED THEY ARE--(INSTEAD OF WORKING).
- THEY DON'T HAVE THE TIME (OR THE WILL) TO GO OUT AND LOOK FOR A JOB.
- THEY ARE TERRIFIED ABOUT BEING FORCED TO BET A LEGITIMATE ID TO SHOW/VOTE AT THE POLLS
WHY? BECAUSE OBAMA AND HIS LIBERAL DEMOCRATIC APPOINTEES WILL TAKE CARE OF THEM ($$$).
SICKENING.
JOHN
IF ANYONE WANTS MANY MORE EXAMPLES OF "HILLARY" NEGATIVES, PLEASE EMAIL.
NOTE THAT SOME OF IT IS STRONGLY "R" RATED--BY HER LANGUAGE.
AND IT WILL TAKE A WHILE TO EVEN COMPILE IT ALL.
---------------------------
PLEASE USE NEW EMAIL ADDRESS: [email protected]
See my commentary at http://www.brennerbrief.com/author/johnmariotti/ and
---------------------------
Recent Comments